ConnectDevs

Tag: recruiting pricing

  • Recruitment CRM Software for Agencies: 8 Tools Compared for 2026

    Recruitment CRM Software for Agencies: 8 Tools Compared for 2026

    Recruitment CRM Software for Agencies: 8 Tools Compared for 2026

    Recruitment CRM software is the system an agency uses to track clients, open searches, candidates and placements in one place. A weak one costs you placements through lost notes, missed follow-ups and duplicate outreach. A good one makes a ten-person desk behave like one team.

    This guide compares eight recruitment CRM tools on listed per-seat pricing, who each fits and where each falls short. It also shows what a CRM does not do, because many agencies buy a CRM to fix a sourcing problem it was never built to solve.

    TL;DR

    • Listed per-user prices in this comparison range from $15 to $119 per month. Several vendors publish no price at all.
    • A recruitment CRM manages relationships and pipeline. It does not find new candidates for you.
    • Agencies need a client side (business development, deals, contracts) as well as a candidate side. Check both.
    • Multiply the per-seat price by your headcount before you compare. A $119 tool costs $14,280 a year for ten recruiters.
    • Test any shortlist on one live search before you sign.

    Table of Contents

    What recruitment CRM software does

    A recruitment CRM stores candidate and client records, tracks every conversation and moves people through a pipeline from first contact to placement. Many products combine this with applicant tracking, so the line between a recruiting CRM and an ATS is blurry. For agencies the difference matters less than whether the tool handles both the candidate side and the client side.

    A typical agency desk uses a CRM to:

    • keep a searchable candidate database across all clients;
    • run email sequences to past candidates and prospects;
    • track client deals, open jobs and submissions;
    • report on placements, fill rate and revenue per recruiter.

    What agencies should evaluate

    Score each tool on the criteria below before you look at price.

    1. Client management. Does it track business development, deals and contracts, or only candidates?
    2. Candidate search. Can recruiters find a past candidate by skill, location and last contact date in seconds?
    3. Outreach. Are email sequences built in, and do replies log automatically?
    4. Job distribution. Can you post to boards from the tool?
    5. Reporting. Can you see placements and activity per recruiter without a spreadsheet?
    6. Data export. Can you leave? Check that you can export every record before you commit.
    7. Price at your headcount. See the cost section below.

    8 recruitment CRM tools compared

    Prices below come from Recruiterflow’s published comparison of recruitment CRM software. That page is a vendor blog that ranks Recruiterflow first, it does not say when prices were checked, and several billing bases are unstated. Treat every figure as a starting point and confirm it on the vendor’s own site.

    Tool Listed price Best fit Watch for
    Recruiterflow $119 per user per month Retained, contingent and executive search firms Highest listed seat price in this group
    Bullhorn Not listed Mid-size and large agencies Quote-based, so budgeting takes a sales call
    Recruit CRM $99 per user per month (Standard) Small and mid-sized firms Check which AI features need a higher plan
    Crelate $110 per user per month Independent recruiters and agencies Confirm Outlook and email-tracking limits
    Zoho Recruit $30 per user per month (Standard) In-house teams and small agencies Lower tiers may lack advanced automation
    Manatal $15 per user per month (entry tiers) Cost-sensitive teams Test depth of client and deal tracking
    Big Biller (Top Echelon) $89 per user per month US and Canada contingency, retained and contract firms Regional focus
    JobAdder On request Recruitment consultants and talent teams No public price to compare

    A few patterns stand out. Tools built for agencies tend to cost between roughly $89 and $119 per user per month where a price is listed. General HR products such as Zoho Recruit and Manatal start much lower, but they are not always built around agency workflows like client deals and submissions. Cheap is only cheap if your recruiters actually use it.

    The real cost per seat

    Per-user pricing hides the number that matters. Here is the arithmetic for a ten-recruiter agency, using the listed monthly prices:

    Listed price per user Monthly (10 seats) Annual (10 seats)
    $15 $150 $1,800
    $30 $300 $3,600
    $99 $990 $11,880
    $119 $1,190 $14,280

    Add set-up fees, data migration, extra modules and any paid integrations. The cheapest tool that gets abandoned by half the desk costs more than a pricier one everyone uses. For context on how these costs compare with other recruiting spend, see our cost per hire benchmark for engineering roles.

    What a CRM does not do

    A CRM is a system of record. It holds the candidates you already have and the clients you already know. It does not decide who to call next, and it does not fill a pipeline from nothing.

    That is why many agencies pair a CRM with a sourcing layer. Our piece on placements per recruiter explains how admin time, not talent supply, often limits desk output. Two gaps come up repeatedly:

    To be clear about scope: ConnectDevs is not a recruitment CRM or an ATS. It does not manage client deals or contracts. Agencies use it next to a CRM for sourcing, enrichment and first-round AI interviews. Its plans run from free to $459 per month, listed on the pricing page, with five seats included on the top tier.

    How to test before you commit

    Run a two-week trial on one live search, not a demo with sample data.

    1. Import 500 real candidate records and check for duplicates and field mapping errors.
    2. Have two recruiters log a full search from client brief to submission.
    3. Send one email sequence and confirm replies log automatically.
    4. Build the placement report your managing director asks for each month.
    5. Export everything and open the file. If the export is incomplete, that is your answer.

    FAQ

    What is recruitment CRM software?

    It is software that stores candidate and client records, tracks outreach and moves candidates through a pipeline. Agencies also use it to track client deals and placements.

    What is the difference between a recruiting CRM and an ATS?

    An ATS manages applicants who apply to specific jobs. A CRM manages relationships with candidates and clients over time, including people who have not applied. Many agency tools combine both.

    How much does recruitment CRM software cost?

    Listed prices in this comparison run from $15 to $119 per user per month. Several vendors, including Bullhorn and JobAdder, require a quote.

    Do agencies need a CRM and a sourcing tool?

    Usually yes. The CRM holds the relationships you have. A sourcing tool finds new candidates and feeds them into it.

    What features matter most for staffing agencies?

    Client and deal tracking, fast candidate search, email sequences with reply logging, job board posting and per-recruiter reporting.

    Can I switch recruitment CRMs without losing data?

    Only if the old tool exports every record in a usable format. Test the export before you sign, and keep both systems running in parallel for a few weeks.

    Conclusion

    Pick the CRM that your whole desk will use, at a seat price you have multiplied by your real headcount. Then decide separately how you will fill it with new candidates, because the CRM will not do that for you. Shortlist two tools, test both on a live search and let the export test settle ties.

    Want to feed your CRM with fresh candidates? Start sourcing candidates with ConnectDevs and push the best matches into the system you already use.

  • hireEZ Alternatives: 8 Tools Compared for Recruiters in 2026

    hireEZ Alternatives: 8 Tools Compared for Recruiters in 2026

    hireEZ Alternatives: 8 Tools Compared for Recruiters in 2026

    The best hireEZ alternatives depend on what you want to fix: contact data, price clarity, or a tool that does more than outbound sourcing. hireEZ is a capable platform, and its reviews are strong. Still, many teams reach a renewal and ask whether another tool fits better. This guide compares eight options using public vendor pages and review sites, so you can shortlist quickly. We cover pricing as published, what each tool does best, and who should skip it.

    TL;DR

    • hireEZ holds 4.6/5 on G2 (264 reviews) and 4.7/5 on Capterra (103 reviews). Its most reported issues are outdated contact data and unclear pricing.
    • hireEZ does not publish list pricing. A third-party estimate from Vendr puts the median contract near $13,000 a year.
    • Juicebox, Fetcher, Loxo, Manatal and ConnectDevs publish pricing. SeekOut, Gem and Findem publish little or none.
    • Pick by job to be done: sourcing only, recruiting CRM or ATS, enterprise data, or sourcing plus enrichment plus AI interviews.

    Table of Contents

    What hireEZ is and what it does well

    hireEZ is an AI recruiting platform that centers on outbound sourcing, with a talent CRM, applicant review, AI screening and scheduling layered on top. Its site describes searching “a billion-plus profiles, 45+ platforms” and working on top of your existing ATS. You can see the full module list on the hireEZ website.

    Fairness matters here, because hireEZ earns its ratings. Reviewers on G2 praise the easy interface, sourcing beyond LinkedIn, email sequences, ATS integrations and responsive support. Capterra reviewers also call it an affordable alternative to LinkedIn Recruiter and rate customer service 4.8/5 (Capterra).

    If your team sources passive candidates across many sites and your current setup works, you may not need to switch. This list is for teams that hit one of the friction points below.

    Why teams look for hireEZ alternatives

    Reviewers report a fairly consistent set of complaints. We list what is reported, not our own testing.

    • Contact data accuracy. G2 reviewers cite outdated or incorrect emails and phone numbers as the most frequent issue. Capterra reviewers mention the same inconsistency.
    • Pricing transparency. G2 reviewers mention unexpected price increases and unclear costs.
    • Search quality. Some reviewers find advanced filters clunky. One Capterra reviewer said the AI tagging was “not very accurate” for specialized roles and that Boolean support is limited compared with other tools.
    • Interface changes. G2 reviewers say frequent updates make features hard to find.
    • Data hygiene. Capterra reviewers note occasional duplicate profiles.

    A competitor’s blog adds credit caps and a steep learning curve for new users (Juicebox). Treat that source with care, since Juicebox sells a rival product. The G2 and Capterra patterns are the better evidence.

    hireEZ pricing: what is public

    hireEZ pricing is quote-based, not published. The hireEZ site offers a free trial and a demo request but no price list. According to Vendr, which analyzes buyer contracts, the median buyer pays about $13,000 per year, with observed contracts between $7,000 and $25,000. Vendr also describes a typical per-recruiter-seat annual model with costs that vary by modules, volume and integrations.

    That is a third-party estimate, not an official price. Use it as a negotiation reference only. Ask for a written quote with seats, credits, overage terms and renewal caps.

    Comparison table

    Pricing reflects what each vendor publishes as of this writing. “Not public” means the vendor page did not list prices. Always confirm on the vendor site.

    Tool Best for Standout capability Pricing model (as published) Fit
    Juicebox Small teams wanting natural-language search Search plus AI agents that auto-email and shortlist Free; $99-$199/mo by plan; Business custom; agents $199/mo each Lean outbound teams
    SeekOut Technical and specialized sourcing Search across 1B+ profiles with deep filtering Core from $149/mo; team plans custom Teams that value filters
    Gem Teams wanting CRM, ATS and analytics together All-in-one recruiting stack Custom by headcount; startup plan published Mid-size to growth teams
    Findem Enterprise talent intelligence Attribute-based “people intelligence” Not public Larger organizations
    Fetcher Teams that want a sourcer’s help Optional done-for-you sourcing $115-$649/mo; enterprise custom Low-volume, hands-off hiring
    Loxo Agencies and teams needing ATS plus sourcing ATS, CRM and candidate database in one From $149 and $199 per user/mo (annual) Agencies, search firms
    Manatal Budget-conscious agencies Low-cost ATS with AI features $15-$55 per user/mo; custom tier Small agencies
    ConnectDevs Sourcing, enrichment and AI interviews in one workflow Scout search plus enrichment plus SAM voice interviews Free; $99-$459/mo by plan; credit based Startups, agencies, lean TA teams

    The 8 hireEZ alternatives

    1. Juicebox

    Best for: small teams that want natural-language search at a published price.

    Juicebox publishes four tiers: a free plan, Starter at $99/month (monthly billing), Growth at $179/month, and a custom Business plan with ATS and CRM integration. Paid tiers include contact and export credits, and AI Agents cost $199/month each. Yearly billing takes 15% off most plans (Juicebox pricing).

    Watch for: credit limits on lower tiers, and agent costs that stack up per role.

    2. SeekOut

    Best for: technical and specialized searches where filter depth matters.

    SeekOut’s entry Core plan lists at $149/month billed annually ($179 monthly) with 500 monthly contact credits and 1,000 exports. Team, integration and full-funnel plans use custom per-seat annual pricing (SeekOut pricing). We cover it in depth in our SeekOut alternatives guide.

    Watch for: the same contact-data checks you would run on any vendor, plus the quote-only pricing above the entry plan.

    3. Gem

    Best for: teams that want sourcing, CRM, ATS, scheduling and analytics in one place.

    Gem runs as “Gem + Your ATS” or as an all-in-one platform with its own ATS. Pricing is custom by company size, though it publishes a startup program for companies of 1-10 FTE (Gem pricing).

    Watch for: implementation time. A suite replaces more of your stack, which means more change management.

    4. Findem

    Best for: enterprise teams that want attribute-based talent intelligence.

    Findem describes itself as a people intelligence platform spanning sourcing, engagement, screening, AI video interviews and analytics. Its homepage claims “24x faster sourcing”; those are vendor claims, so ask for references. No pricing is published, and the site points visitors to a demo (Findem).

    Watch for: enterprise scope and quote-only pricing, which leaves you in the same spot you may be in with hireEZ.

    5. Fetcher

    Best for: teams that want to hand part of sourcing to a human.

    Fetcher lists Self-serve at $115/month (300 leads a month), Growth at $379/month and Amplify at $649/month with a dedicated sourcer for roughly 4-6 roles. Annual commitment saves 30% (Fetcher pricing).

    Watch for: lead caps. High-volume recruiters will outgrow the lower tiers quickly.

    6. Loxo

    Best for: agencies and search firms that need an ATS, CRM and sourcing database together.

    Core starts at $149 per user per month (annual) and includes the ATS and CRM with AI search. Professional starts at $199 per user per month and adds Loxo Source, an 850M+ talent database, AI agents and 2,500 monthly credits per seat (Loxo pricing).

    Watch for: per-seat costs add up for larger teams. It also replaces your ATS, so it suits you only if you plan to switch one.

    7. Manatal

    Best for: small agencies and budget-limited teams.

    Manatal publishes the lowest prices in this list: Professional at $15 per user per month (annual), Enterprise at $35 and Enterprise Plus at $55. Plans include sourcing, ATS, AI enrichment and a recruiting CRM, and the AI Interviewer is an add-on (Manatal pricing).

    Watch for: it is ATS-first. If outbound sourcing across many sites is your main job, test depth before you commit.

    8. ConnectDevs

    Best for: teams that want AI sourcing, enrichment and AI interviews in one workflow.

    ConnectDevs Scout turns role requirements into a structured search across what the company describes as a published 800M+ public-profile graph, then organizes evidence for recruiter review. Enrichment normalizes work history, skills and contact routes, and the page says it provides field-level sources, timestamps and confidence. The AI interviewer (SAM) runs voice-based, role-specific screening interviews and produces ranked reports.

    Published pricing is credit based: a free plan, then Starter at $99/month ($79 billed annually), Growth at $189/month and Scale at $459/month. A search costs 1 credit, enrichment 5 and an interview with report 10.

    Watch for: ConnectDevs says it is not a full replacement for an ATS, HRIS, scheduling or background-screening tools. It also states that enrichment accuracy varies by field and source. Run a pilot on a live role and check contact quality yourself.

    How to choose

    Start with the problem you want gone. A feature checklist hides it.

    • Bad contact data: test every shortlisted tool on the same 50 candidates. Count bounces and wrong numbers. Our LinkedIn Recruiter alternatives guide covers more sourcing options.
    • Price surprises: favor vendors that publish tiers (Juicebox, Fetcher, Loxo, Manatal, ConnectDevs). For quote-only vendors, negotiate renewal caps in writing.
    • Too many tools: a suite like Gem or Loxo cuts handoffs. A narrower stack with sourcing, enrichment and interviews cuts them too, without replacing your ATS.
    • Enterprise needs: Findem and SeekOut fit larger programs. Budget time for implementation.

    Pilot two tools for two weeks on the same open role. Compare qualified replies, time spent and cost per qualified candidate. Do not buy on a demo alone.

    FAQ

    What are the best hireEZ alternatives?

    Common alternatives are Juicebox, SeekOut, Gem, Findem, Fetcher, Loxo, Manatal and ConnectDevs. The right pick depends on whether you need sourcing only, an ATS and CRM, enterprise data, or sourcing plus interviews. LinkedIn Recruiter is also a frequent comparison.

    How much does hireEZ cost?

    hireEZ does not publish list prices. Vendr reports a median contract of about $13,000 per year, ranging from $7,000 to $25,000. Treat that as an estimate and request a written quote.

    What are hireEZ competitors?

    Direct hireEZ competitors in AI sourcing include SeekOut, Juicebox, Findem, Fetcher and Gem. Loxo and Manatal compete when you also want an ATS or recruiting CRM. G2 and Capterra both list more options.

    Is hireEZ worth it?

    For many teams, yes. It holds 4.6/5 on G2 and 4.7/5 on Capterra, and reviewers praise sourcing breadth and support. Test contact accuracy and get pricing in writing before you renew.

    hireEZ vs Juicebox: which is better?

    Juicebox publishes pricing starting free and at $99/month, which suits small teams. hireEZ is quote-based and covers more modules, such as CRM, scheduling and screening. Compare both on the same role and measure contact accuracy.

    Which hireEZ alternative includes AI interviews?

    Findem lists AI video interviews, Manatal sells an AI Interviewer add-on, and ConnectDevs offers SAM voice interviews on its plans. hireEZ also lists conversational AI screening. Compare transcripts, scoring and bias controls. Our AI interview software guide goes deeper.

    Do I need to replace my ATS to switch?

    Not usually. Sourcing-first tools such as hireEZ, Juicebox and ConnectDevs are built to sit alongside an existing ATS, so check each vendor’s integration list. Loxo and Manatal are ATS-first, so adopting them means a bigger migration.

    Conclusion

    hireEZ remains a solid choice with strong reviews. The main reasons to move are contact data you cannot trust, pricing you cannot predict, or a workflow that stops at sourcing. Publish-your-price vendors make comparison easy, and a two-week pilot settles the rest.

    If you want sourcing, enrichment and AI interviews in one workflow, Book a demo and bring a live role to test.